Impact of the Use of Pupil Premium Funding in Our School
Ofsted in April 2015 commented that
“Pupils make rapid progress in all year groups. By the time they leave the school, standards in reading, writing and mathematics are much higher than the national average”
“The pupil premium funding is used very successfully to accelerate pupil progress and ensure that standards at the end of Year 2 are high for all groups of pupils.”
In July 2019 our data shows that the attainment of children for whom we recieve pupil premium funding is broadly in line with their peers in most year groups and areas of learning.
Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (Reception)
EYFS2 |
Good Level of Development ALL PUPILS |
Good Level of Development NON PP |
Good Level of Development PP |
2019 | 88% | National benchmark 74% | 100% |
2020 | NO DATA | NO DATA | NO DATA |
Phonics Screening Check ( Year One)
Year One |
Reached expected Standard on Phonics Screening Check ALL PUPILS |
Reached expected Standard on Phonics Screening Check NON PP |
Reached expected Standard on Phonics Screening Check PP |
2019 | 96% |
95% National benchmark 84% |
100% National benchmark 84% |
2020 | NO DATA | NO DATA | NO DATA |
End of Key Stage One Assessments ( Year Two)
2019 Data - no data available for 2020
In all areas our attainment for the PP groups was smaller than or broadly in line with the national benchmark.
We ae not complacent and continue to work to narow the gap between our pupil premium children and the other children in our school at the End of Key Stage One, as we have in the other year groups.
Key stage 1 reading attainment by pupil group | |||
Breakdown | Cohort | Achieved the expected standard or higher | |
Sch % | Nat % | ||
All pupils | 87 | 93 | 75 |
Ever 6 FSM | 17 | 76 | 78 |
NOT FSM | 68 | 97 | 78 |
Key stage 1 writing attainment by pupil group | |||
Breakdown | Cohort | Achieved the expected standard or higher | |
Sch % | Nat % | ||
All pupils | 87 | 93 | 69 |
Ever 6 FSM | 17 | 82 | 73 |
NOT FSM | 68 | 96 | 73 |
Key stage 1 maths attainment by pupil group | |||
Breakdown | Cohort | Achieved the expected standard or higher | |
Sch % | Nat % | ||
All pupils | 87 | 93 | 69 |
Ever 6 FSM | 17 | 82 | 73 |
NOT FSM | 68 | 96 | 73 |